claim that everything came into being as follows:There was originally nothing - a complete
void in the universe (no one can explain how the unlimited void came into being
in the first place).But there was a
tremendously dense mass of gases that suddenly exploded and created all the
energy and matter in the universe.As
the gasses flew into the void, it eventually became a unified system
coordinated and controlled by certain physical laws.Millions of galaxies were formed and the
universe continues to expand at the speed of light.Our solar system is but a tiny speck in the
universe.Evolutionists claim that given
the age of the universe - 2 or 3 billion years, everything came into being by
accident.Life emerged 2-½ billion years
ago by pure chance.
is no evidence to back up this theory.It flies in the face of the second law of Thermodynamics that says that
“order evolves into chaos, “rather than “chaos evolves into order.”But, evolutionists are trying to sell us the
idea that all order in the universe came from a horrendous, chaotic explosion
of matter and gases that did not exist before.
takes more faith to believe in the big bang theory than it does to believe in a
THE BEGINNING OF LIFE
to some evolutionists, life began when lightning struck rolling waves and
combined with dirt in the water to make life.This has never been proven or duplicated in the laboratory.According to that theory, a simple, living,
single cell emerged and had the ability to seek food, eat and digest it, and to
multiply itself through reproduction.Scientist cannot tell us what intelligence prompted the simple, single
cell to reproduce or seek food.Eventually, that single cell became a complex cell that over billions of
years evolved into all the life forms we have today, including man.
in order for that single, simple cell to survive, it had to instantaneously
possess the ability to consume and digest food and to reproduce.What are the odds that this happened -
especially with a single, simple cell that could exist for only the shortest
span of time?Then too, what food?Even if there were sources of food, the cell
had to be able to distinguish food from non-food.For the cell to find digestible food, it had
to have the mechanism to allow it to seek and find food.Also - it could not digest food unless it had
a complex digestive system.All this had
to be present from the very beginning of its creation through accident and
reality, there is no such thing as a simple cell.The closest we can find on earth is the
one-cell amoeba.But the amoeba is far
from being simple.Hundreds of cilia on
its surface enable it to travel through fluids, seek food, surround the food
and digest it.It has a complex
reproductive system and can sense light and darkness.In fact, scientists cannot even duplicate
what an amoeba can do.It is too
complex.How then, could an amoeba or
any other simple life form come into existence purely by chance?
evolutionists are promoting the following formula:Electricity + water + dirt = life.Ridiculous.Thousands of laboratory tests and trials have never come close to
verifying that theory.
to Sir Frederick Hoyle, famous scientist and mathematician, the probability of
life being created purely by chance is 1 X 1040,000, or 1 chance in
1 followed by 40,000 zeros.Since one
trillion is only 1012 , the probability of life being created purely
by accident is 1 in 3,333.33 trillion.By comparison, there are only 1080,000 electrons in the
entire universe.Mathematicians claim
that 1050 is impossible.Therefore, 1040,000 is impossible, no matter how much time is
allotted and no matter how many conceivable opportunities could exist for it to
happen.Life could not have happened by
Harold Morowitz, former professor of biophysics at YaleUniversity,
estimates that the probability for the chance formation of the smallest,
simplest form of a living organism known is one chance in 10340,000,000.Hoyle was being over-generous in his
Sagan, famous evolutionist, estimated that the chance of life evolving on any
single planet like earth is one chance in 102,000,000,000.
the formation of just one molecule is impossible, how can you explain the
complexity of life forms, or the formation of the extremely detailed DNA
code?Human DNA contains three billion
pieces of information - tens of thousands of pages worth in just one human.Did the information develop one page at a
time?In other words, each of the pieces
of DNA had to happen by chance one at a time, since each piece controls or
affects one physical characteristic.
Sagan admits:The information content of
the human brain is comparable to the total number of connections among neutrons
- about a hundred trillion, 1014 bits.If written in English, it would take 20
million volumes - as many as the largest libraries contain.
you line up a computer, a robot, a 747 jet and a lowly worm, which is the most
intricately designed?The worm.Scientists cannot even duplicate all the
functions in a simple worm - its ability to sense food, avoid danger, eat and
digest, see, hear and move, etc.If the
computer, robot and 747 jet had a designer and creator, how can we think that
the worm happened by luck and chance over time?The odds would be like a tornado hitting a large junk yard and leaving
behind a computer, robot and 747 jet airplane.
things cannot come together piece by piece.All the parts have to come together at once for it to work.If one part is missing, it will not
work.Like an automobile, each major
part of the engine must be present for the engine to function as it
selection can only choose systems that are already working.Therefore, complex mechanisms would have to
arise as an integrated unit in one fell swoop, for natural selection to have
anything to act on.In other words, for
an amphibian to turn into a bird, the mechanisms that will enable a bird to fly
could not evolve over millions of years.The complex parts had to be in place from the beginning for an amphibian
instance, a human knee joint has 16 essential characteristics, each requiring
thousands of pieces of information to exist simultaneously in the genetic
code.Therefore, the knee could not have
evolved gradually but must have been created all at once as a whole, fully
functioning unit.An animal cannot
“develop” a fully-functioning knee over time.Same with the human eye.
human eye has complex features that allow it to have automatic aiming,
focusing,aperture adjustment, etc.It can see in bright sunlight and dark and
can see an object the diameter of a fine hair, and perform 100,000 separate
motions in an average day.The eye
carries on its own maintenance work as we sleep.All of these features have to already be in
place for it to function as an eye.If
any part is missing, it could not function as an eye.
flagellum of some bacteria is a little motor-driven propeller that spins at
100,000 rpm and can change direction in a quarter turn.It is an intricate machinery that includes
the equivalent of a rotor, stator, O-rings, bushings and drive shaft and requires
the coordinated interaction of approximately 40 complex protein parts.If any part is missing or not available in
the right proportions, it cannot function.All of these parts and functions cannot happen by chance.
a single cell is incredibly complex.It
is like a factory that contains an elaborate network of interlocking assembly
lines, each of which is composed of a set of large protein machines.These protein assemblies contain highly
coordinated moving parts.Each part must
be in place simultaneously or it cannot function.These highly intricate machines in cells are
much more advanced than what man has been able to create.
Gates says that the DNA in cells is far, far more advanced than any software
ever created.The complexity of DNA,
genes and chromosomes defies evolution.Just about every living creature defies evolution.If there is even one animal that required God
as its creator, then we need to consider a creator God.Evolutionists stubbornly refuse to
acknowledge a creator but put their faith in blind chance.In other words, everything created in the
universe was created by chance over time.
THE FOSSIL EVIDENCE
main basis of Darwin’s
theory of evolution is that over time, one species became another completely
new species until we eventually had the over 250,000 species present today, not
taking into account the many thousands of already-extinct species of animals
relies heavily on the discovery of fossil forms of early life.Fossils are mineralized remains.Over time, minerals from the surrounding soil
seep into the original bones and as the once-living tissues disintegrate, the
hardened minerals within the bone remain.To date, over 100 million fossils of ancient creatures such as dinosaurs
have been discovered and exhibited in major museums, many of them complete
skeletons.Some fossils have been dated
earlier than 248 million years.Dinosaurs are claimed to have roamed the earth between 248 and 65
million years ago and they were preceded by many other life forms millions of
years before that.
Field Museum of Chicago, the BritishMuseum of Natural History
and the New York Museum of Natural History collectively possess about 50% of
all unearthed fossils.Yet, the top
paleontologists of each of the three museums have declared that there is no
fossil evidence of one species of any animal or plant evolving into another
species of animal or plant.These
individuals have custody over at least 50 million fossils and have spent
lifetimes investigating and studying them.Yet, all three have declared that they have never found any fossil
indicating that one species changed into another.
all living forms evolved from a single ancestor, there should be millions of
fossils showing step by step how species changed in order to reach the over
250,000 known species existing today.In
addition, evolution should be an on-going process.
EVOLUTION OF MAN
biggest piece of evidence of ape changing into men would no doubt be the
discovery of many “missing links” showing the progression of ape or an ape
ancestor, bit by bit, until modern man evolved.Yet, there is absolutely no fossil evidence that man evolved from apes
or a common ancestor, although the evolution of man is supposed to have taken
place about 245 million years after dinosaurs appeared.We have millions upon millions of dinosaur
fossils and absolutely none of humanoids.
attempts and hoaxes have been presented as the “missing link” between man and
apes.Great hoopla have met each such
discovery as evolutionists gleefully claimed that this was the fool-proof
evidence of evolution.However, most if
not all of the so-called missing links have already been proven either false or
THE MISSING LINKS
have found:Nebraska Man, Piltdown Man, Java Man, Peking
Man, Neanderthal Man and Lucy.All were
supposed to be “missing links” between modern man and either apes or a common
ancestor.But all of these so-called
missing links have been proven to be hoaxes.
NebraskaMan.A single tooth later found to be from an
Man.A deliberate hoax.Years after it was hailed as the missing link
that proves for all time that man was descended from apes or a common ancestor,
it was found that Piltdown Man was drawn from a skull fragment of a modern
human, and a jawbone and two teeth from an orangutan.In 1953, Joseph Weiner of OxfordUniversity,
and Le Gros Clark of the same institution proved it to be a total forgery.The bone fragments had been stained to make
it look aged.
Man.This “missing link” was constructed from
widely scattered bones. A skull cap and femur were found far apart in a gravel
pit.These were actually unrelated parts
of a “modern” human being and a giant gibbon.
actually monkey-like skulls bashed in at the back and found with various animal
bones and tools and therefore, concluded that a “tool-using ape” were man’s
ancestors.Instead, these animals were
man’s meals and tools were used on them rather than by them.
just plain, modern people who suffered from dietary deficiencies because of the
lack of certain minerals available.Rickets and arthritis were rampant in the remains and resulted in a
hunchbacked, head-forward walk.
Lucy could not be a missing link
because it was determined that man walked upright before the time of Lucy.Also - the bones were found 2 miles apart.
are so anxious to prove evolution that they will draw a complete human body,
with hair, ape-like appearance and body angles out of a single tooth and piece
of skull.Yet, these fraudulent claims
continue to be published in elementary school textbooks and taught to our
children as truth even after they were proven to be fraudulent, while
creationism is consistently rejected.Even today, public schools continue teaching evolution of man from apes
or a common ancestor, without any real evidence.Evolution, it seems, is an anti-christ
religion based purely on man’s imagination and rejection of God.
LACK OF FOSSIL EVIDENCE
man evolved from a common ancestor to the apes or from apes, many transitional
forms should have been found, even complete skeletons.As mentioned earlier, dinosaurs and other
animals lived between 248 and 65 millions years ago and thousands of complete
skeleton fossils have been found.Yet,
the first ape-man is supposed to have appeared only 3.6 million years ago
compared to 248 to 65 million years for dinosaurs.Why then have no complete or even partial
skeletons of humanoids been discovered?(Humanoids are creatures that are supposed to be transitional forms from
ape to homo sapiens)There are none.
are no transitional forms for all modern species either - that’s 250,000 living
species.Once in a while, a scientist
will discover a fossil that seems to be a little different from others of its
species.They gleefully proclaim that
this is a missing link or transitional form proving Darwin’s theory.But all so-called “transitional” fossils
stand alone with no other fossils to show the next steps in evolution.In other words, there are no other successive
“transitional” fossils to trace the next steps in evolution.
are over 100 million dinosaur and similar fossils in existence today stored in
many large warehouses.On the other
hand, if you put all the so-called “missing link” humanoid fossils together,
they could not cover the top of a billiard table.If the first ape-man appeared between 244.4
million years after the dinosaurs, why are there 100 million dinosaur
fossils and no authenticated fossils of missing links of humans?Fossils of humanoids (human-like creatures)
and post-dinosaur species should number in the hundreds of millions.There are none.
Colin Patterson, director of the BritishMuseum of Natural History
admits that he has seven million fossils in his museum but not one transitional
fossil, humanoid or otherwise.The chief
curators of the Field Museum of Chicago and the New York Museum of Natural
History also report that they have no transitional fossils of any modern
species in their possession.Yet, as
mentioned, these three institutions are in possession of at least 50% (over
fifty million) of all fossils discovered to date.
Eldridge, a leading expert in vertebrate fossils, honestly admits that any
discovery of transitional fossils is only a very occasional slight accumulation
of change over millions of years, at a rate too slow to account for all the
prodigious changes that have occurred in evolutionary history.The few abberations we do see cannot be
considered as firm evidence.For
instance, a fossil of a prehistoric fish was recently discovered with what
appears to be an extra bone in its frontal fin.Evolutionists happily declared that this is proof that the fish was a
transitional form that eventually grew legs that would enable it to walk on
land.But where are all the other
transitional forms in between?It is
still just a fish with an extra bone at most.
most scientist can say is that they have discovered a few fossils that seem to
indicate some intermediary species.Yet,
these so-called intermediary species stand alone, with no other successive
fossil to indicate the next “mutant” or gradual change that ultimately resulted
in a new species.
more compelling is the complete lack of transitional fossils of all the
other modern species in existence today.
THE CAMBRIAN PERIOD
are perplexed that there was a species explosion over a period of a few hundred
thousand years, during which most of our modern species suddenly appeared, as
compared to the theory that modern life forms evolved over millions of
years.In other words, most of the
species existing today suddenly came into being 200,000 years ago.About 80% of the species existing on earth
today were found in their present form in strata identified as the Cambrian
Strata or the Cambrian period of prehistoric history.Later, we will show that the modern dating
methods, including carbon-dating, are far from being accurate.
just a single tooth and a small piece of skull bone, evolutionists have created
entire drawings of half-ape, half-man humanoids and presented it as pure
truth.But, there has been no valid
humanoid fossil to show that man evolved from some primitive animal.
fossil record is clear evidence that evolution is only a pipe dream.Unto this very day, there is no fossil
evidence that a cat turned into a dog or into a horse.
a species, there can be many sub-species such as with dogs and horses.But a dog is still a dog, no matter if one
has a short tail and the other one a longer tail.Even among horses, there are many variations,
but an Arab or Apaloosa or draft horse is still a horse.The Arab horse, in fact, has one less
vertebra than other breeds, but it does not prove that it is a missing link for
a future new species.It is still a
horse with one less vertebrae.Frogs
come in many forms, colors and sizes, but a frog is still a frog and none of
the variations is a transitional form that will evolve into another species of
animal.Natural selection does not
change one species into another.
are very rare among living species.Moreover, mutants are overwhelmingly not an improvement on, but a lesser
model from the original and the changes are not only accidental but non-beneficial.They did not appear because of a need to
survive.They were purely
accidental.Secondly, mutants do not
normally live long enough to reproduce.Even if they do, they would have to find another exact mutant of the
opposite sex, with the same physical/mental features, in order to pass on their
aberrant features, given the complex system of chromosomes, genes and DNA.In the overwhelming amount of cases,
mutations did not reproduce, even where scientists intentionally mutated
simpler life forms in the laboratory and attempted to have them reproduce
do not prove evolution.They are both
rare, non-beneficial (not an advanced form) and non-reproducible.Yet, evolutionists continue to claim that one
species evolved into another through mutation.
NO PROOF OF ON-GOING CHANGES
evolution is a valid theory, that means that many species should be in
transition at this very moment and one should find many evidences of one
species evolving into another.Yet, no
such transition has ever been discovered.In an attempt to explain this lack of on-going evolution, evolutionists
claim that all species have reached a point of perfection and therefore,
further evolution is not required.But
who told the 250,000 species on earth that they are now perfect and can stop
evolving?It is not reasonable to claim
that all species reached their maximum potential and design at one period of
time and therefore there is no need to evolve anymore.Instead, it has been found that over 80% of
the species living today, already existed in the identical form tens of
millions of years ago and have not evolved since.In other words, they were created perfect
from the very beginning.
COMPLEXITIES OF LIFE
to evolutionists, all life forms were created through pure chance or accident
and without particular design.Yet, the
human eye can see an object and transfer an image of that object to the brain
within 1/100ths of a second.It would
take the most sophisticated computer in the world today over 100 years to
duplicate that same transfer.The human
body’s skeletal system is so complex that scientists cannot duplicate most of
its functions.The twelve middle vertebrae
in the spinal column (called dorsal or thoracic vertebrae) each have two holes
on the sides, out of which over 300,000 nerve channels or fibers emerge.These nerve fibers control most of the
functions in the human body.It would be
a colossal feat for these fibers to accidentally and without purpose, suddenly
grow out of the spinal column.In other
words, 7,200,000 nerve fibers suddenly came on the scene in a spontaneous burst
and created part of the nervous system of the human body.Even if only part of the nerve fibers came
into existence every few million years, it would be a tremendous feat.It is mathematically impossible.
to evolutionists, animals such as the giraffe became that way through natural
selection.In the case of the giraffe,
evolutionists claim that at one time, all the grass and low bushes disappeared
and the giraffe was forced to reach up into the tree tops in order to find food
in order to survive.Over centuries of
stretching for food on tree tops, the giraffe gradually got its long neck.As grass and low bushes became increasingly
rare over millions of years, the giraffe’s neck became longer and longer.But that theory is full of holes.
one thing, if the giraffe was forced to reach into tree tops for food, and no
other grazing or low bush eating animals could survive, then how come we have
found so many such animals living in the same time period that the giraffe
lived?Within the same soil strata,
scientists have found all manner of ground feeders.How did they survive?Secondly, it is known that the female giraffe
is about two feet shorter in height than the male.How did the females ever survive to
reproduce?Wouldn’t the taller males eat
all the tree tops and leave nothing for the females?What about the shorter younger giraffes?While it is true that the taller male
giraffes could have been smart enough to toss some food to the ground, modern
behavior of giraffes discount that theory.
still cannot explain how the giraffe’s special circulatory system evolved so
that a giraffe can feed on the ground and lift up its head suddenly when danger
is sensed.The sudden change in blood
pressure would cause all the blood in the giraffe’s head to drain abruptly,
resulting in the giraffe “fainting” and falling to the ground.The intricate and complex valve system in a
giraffe is amazing.Did the giraffe say
to itself, “I need to develop a heart and valve system so that when I see a
lion approaching, I can raise my head suddenly without fainting?”
THE FISH THAT BECAME A
MAMMAL AND THEN RETURNED TO THE OCEAN
are hard-pressed to explain their theory that in the beginning, there were only
fish that could breathe under water.Over millions of years, some fishes gradually learned how to walk on
land and developed a lung that could breathe air out of water.They evolved into mammals.Then, for some unexplained reason, some
mammals found a need to go back to the water and that’s how we got our whales
and dolphins who are mammals.Evolutionists claim that food on land had become scarce and mammals such
as bears or similar animal had to go back to the water to feed.One scientist claimed that he observed a
polar bear swimming with its mouth open to feed on sea weed.This, according to him, shows that mammals
returned to the water to feed.
is not clear is how these mammals could breed in the water, give birth in the
water and feed their young milk through nipples?Intermediate and transitional forms could not
live if such is the case.All of the
transitional babies would die.They had
to be able to surface for air, dive down and suckle from the very
beginning.Evolution had to be overnight
and not over millions of years.The
species would have died out overnight.
other mammals, whales and dolphins cannot breathe under water, have lungs like
all mammals, hair on their body, reproduce like other mammals, have live births
and produce milk to feed their young.They were made that way from the very beginning of their existence.
AN ORDER, DESIGN, ART AND
we see a house, car, airplane or computer, we know that someone created
it.There is an order, design and art to
it that demands a creator.Some
intelligent being created it.Artists
look at the sunrise or sunset, the mountains and ocean and are awed by the art
and beauty of it.They know that it
wasn’t an accident.Instead of chaos,
there is a beauty to the rainbow, the sunset, the forest and lake.Someone had to have created this art
is a certain beauty, art, order and design in the human body and a tremendously
complexity.When we look at a human body
or even a simple animal, can we think that nobody created it?That it was all an accident?If you look at Mt.Rushmore
with the carvings of four presidents on it, we would not be foolish enough to
think that nature created it over time.
people think that it would take blind faith to believe in God, but we use
calculated faith every day when we cross the street, drive a car, take the
elevator, ride an airplane, etc.It
takes more faith to believe that all life on the planet came into existence
over time and completely by accident.
universe displays creation, design, art and order, the same as a computer or
car.If so, then there should be a
creator, designer, artist or order-er behind it.If you look at a landscape painting, you know
that someone was behind it.Then why
shouldn’t there be someone behind the actual landscape?The apostle Paul said it in Romans 1:20: “For the invisible things of Him from the
creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are
made, even His eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: . .
we know that there cannot be an unpainted painting, an un-sculpted sculpture,
an un-designed design.It doesn’t make
sense.How didthe sun, moon, stars, oceans and sand, each
unique snowflake and your three billion pieces of DNA come together to produce
a unique you?
at the buildings in a city.You know
that there had to be a builder by the work he left behind.When we look at the universe, we know there
has to be a Creator.
FAULTY CARBON DATING
claim that through carbon dating, the dinosaurs lived between 248 and 65
million years ago.Yet, a paleontologist
has recently found soft tissue in the femur of a T Rex, proving that the
dinosaurs were much less than 65 million years old.It was more like tens of thousands years old
if at all.No soft tissue can exist for
65 million years.They also found red
corpuscles in the bone sample, which was extraordinary because red corpuscles
will not preserve for 65 million years under any condition whatsoever.(Discovery Magazine.April 2006.Schweitzer’s Dangerous Discovery.By Barry Yeoman.)Not only were
the bones non-fossilized and original, they were recent enough to contain
intact once-living tissue.
to Yeoman, other paleontologists have often reported a distinct odor while
handling dinosaur bones.That odor is
easily recognizable by others that handle living matter and recently-dead cells
as coming from decaying tissue.Paleontologists are unfamiliar with the odor and thus, do not recognize
that the fossil is actually far from being 65 million years old.
have found fossils of many modern species, including modern human, within the
same strata of rock where they have found dinosaur fossils.This has puzzled them for decades.When modern man or humanoids made their
initial appearances, there were no living dinosaurs.Unlike the movies, there never were cave men
that fought against dinosaurs.The
dinosaurs were long gone before man appeared.Yet, modern man continues to appear in the same strata as dinosaurs.
CAUSE AND EFFECT
every cause there is an effect and vice versa.That’s called the Law of Cause and Effect in science.Every effect has a cause and if you go back
to the very first effect, there has to be a very first cause.Everything in this universe has a cause.Nothing cannot bring itself into being.It requires a cause outside of itself.What came first, the chicken or the egg?
in the coke example, blind, random chance does not give rise to design.It would be like a tornado hitting a junk
yard and leaving a fully formed 747 jet, a Mercedes and a skyscraper.Why?Blind chance cannot do that.
you placed all the pieces of a fine watch in a shoebox and shook it for ten
minutes, do you think that all the parts will come together to be a functioning
watch?If you shook it for five billion
years, would it come together?No
way.There are many more things in the
universe far more complex than a watch.Even a trillion years cannot produce certain things, much less the 2-½
billion years earth is supposed to be in existence.
PERFECT DESIGN DEMANDS A
The earth is positioned at just the right distance from the sun.If we were closer by a few percentage points,
we would all roast to death; if we were farther, we would freeze to death.Temperature variations are kept within
reasonable limits by the nearly circular orbit around the sun.
appreciable change in the rate of rotation of the earth would make life
impossible.If the earth rotated much
faster, many things would be affected:the tides and height of waves, the length of days and nights, the
temperature.Summer days would be too
short to produce enough heat to regulate the rate of evaporation, etc.
moon is at the proper distance away.Any
closer would produce enormous tides.
thickness of the earth’s crust and depth of the oceans are carefully
designed.Any increases would alter the
absorption of free oxygen and CO2 and plant and animal life could not exist.
earth’s axis is tilted just right so that we have four seasons.Any alteration would create too much heat or
ozone layer is just thick enough to create a protective shield against solar
earth’s atmosphere protects the earth by burning 20 million meteors each
day.Any thinner and many meteorites
would hit the earth.
is a balance between oxygen (20%) and nitrogen (78%) and delicate and critical
ratio essential to all life forms.Too
much oxygen and the atmosphere would be explosive; not enough and we could not
earth’s magnetic field provides important protection from harmful cosmic radiation.
of that cannot happen by chance no matter how many trillions of years go by.
LIFE REQUIRES WATER
earth is the only planet proven to have large quantities of water.Water is essential to support life and 2/3rds
of our planet is covered with water.No
other planet and in truth, no other solar system has water.How did this happen?
evolution were true, then it would be true everywhere in the universe.For evolution to happen on other planets,
water must be present.The lack of water
on other planets has perplexed scientists and in their desperation to prove
evolution, they have concocted wild conclusions.In recent times, scientists have proclaimed
that water must have existed on Mars because channels and gorges can be seen on
the surface of that planet and these channels could have been caused by
movements of water.Yet, we know that
movements of molten lava and surface winds can also create channels and
river-like gorges.Scientists claim that
the absence of water on the surface indicates that water lies under the
surface.Again, there is absolutely no
evidence of any of this.
scientist contends that a rock formation on the surface of Mars appears to be a
human face with two eyes, a nose and a mouth.This, he concludes is proof that man once lived on Mars and there may be
underground cities.This face, he
claims, is man’s attempt to tell the universe that human-like life once existed
and could still exist on Mars.What a
fairytale!Natural rock formations that
look like human faces abound on planet earth too.
decades, 24 hours a day, scientists have been sending a continuous radio signal
into space in hopes that some advanced living beings will receive the signals
and send signals back.This would prove
that there are other living beings in the universe.So far, no such thing has occurred.
recently proclaimed that they have finally discovered how water came to planet
earth.A meteorite was seen hitting the
ground in the remote arctic regions.When scientists retrieved pieces of the meteorite in the arctic snow,
traces of water were found in the meteorite.It is now proclaimed that all the water was brought to earth by
meteorites that contained water.First,
how many trillions upon trillions of meteorites containing a small amount of
water in each of them would have to hit earth to produce the miles-deep oceans
surrounding the earth?If the earth is
2-½ billion years old and water was found on the planet over 500 million years
ago, how could such a huge body of water have formed?In fact, 500 million years ago, there was
more water covering the surface of the planet than there is today.How is it that only one meteorite among
hundreds of millions to enter the earth’s atmosphere was found to contain traces
of water?Second, how come our moon and
other planets were not hit by the same meteorite clouds?Third, where are the remains of trillions of
seems that in their over-exuberance to prove that there is no God, scientists
have abandoned common sense.
technology using DNA identification proves beyond a reasonable doubt that one
species cannot turn into another.It is
too complicated to explain in detail at this time; but any fair scientist will
conclude that it is impossible, given the complexity of how chromosomes, genes
and DNA are arranged.
of us starts off as a tiny sphere no larger than a dot on this page.Within that microscopic ball there is over
six feet of DNA, all coiled up.Inside
that DNA is the entire code for what you will become - all your organs and all
your features.It is like a microscopic
computer with a built-in memory.DNA
stores a fantastic number of blueprints and at the right time and place issues
orders for distant parts of the body to build its cells and structures.
give you an idea how complex the DNA system is, each cell in your body contains
a nucleus.Inside the nucleus, among
other things, are chromosomes.Inside
the chromosomes are genes.Inside the
genes is the complicated chemical structure we call DNA.Each gene has thousands or more such DNA
units.Your DNA is scattered all through
your body in about 100 thousand billion specks.The code within each DNA cell is complicated in the extreme!If you were to put all the coded DNA
instructions from just ONE single human cell into English, it would fill many
large volumes, each volume the size of an unabridged dictionary!
egg and sperm join, the manner in which the DNA, chromosomes and genes join and
divide is so complex and quick that 1000 base pairs can divide in one
second.If just one code were omitted,
you would be in serious trouble.
evolutionists claim that all the complicated DNA in each life-form, and all the
DNA in every other life-form, made itself out of dirty water back in the
beginning:lightning hit dirty water and
made living creatures complete with DNA.They not only had their complete genetic code, but they were also immediately
able to hunt for, eat, digest food, move about, perform enzymatic and glandular
functions, reproduce and all the rest.They immediately knew how to produce additional cells and their DNA
began to divide and make new complete cells that could do the same things.Remember, in order to reproduce yourself and
pass on your features, it takes a DNA code.
to evolutionists, the same stroke of lightning made both a male and female pair
and they had complete digestive, respiratory, and circulatory organs and the
ability to reproduce and produce offspring.The same stroke of lightning also made their food, with its own DNA,
male and female parts, etc.
DNA’S NEED FOR A TRANSLATOR
complex DNA had to be in existence from the beginning and there had to be a
process by which DNA could be translated.The modern cell’s translation mechanism contains at least fifty
macromolecular components that could tell the living matter when to start
building certain organs or parts and how.Without a translator, DNA would be useless.Imagine a fetus in its mother’s womb.There is a complex order in which the organs
begin to form.Something regulates the
of this is based on design and design requires an intelligence.Careful thought and structuring was
required.Complexity and the coding it
is based on does not evolve.Left to
themselves, all things become more random and disorganized.DNA could not have come into being randomly
and by accident.
life, even DNA would have no meaning.They would be merely chemicals arranged in a certain pattern.The odds that life could have been created
instantaneously with a complete DNA code imbedded in the single cell are so
astronomical that it would be impossible.Yet, evolutionists are telling us that given enough time, anything can
happen.Evolution is a fairy tale.
- has crushed the hopes of biological evolutionists because it proves that it
would be impossible for one species to change into another since it is a
combination lock and tight.Only
sub-species can occur.Microevolution is
limited by the genetic code.No features
that are not already present in a creature’s DNA can ever be produced by
there are variations within a species, it is always within these limits.Natural selection can only work on the
genetic information present in a population of organisms.Adaptation and natural selection are
biological facts; amoeba to man evolution is not.
amount of natural selection can produce a feathered reptile.A fish cannot change into a mammal.Mutations in genes can only modify or
eliminate existing structures, not create new ones.Natural selection cannot create anything new;
it can only modify something already existing.
cannot produce what is in a living organism - not now, not ever before, not
ever in the future.It just cannot be
done.Even if by chance, all the
chemical and other stuff were put together in the right combination, it still
cannot produce life.Even the smallest
single-cell bacteria have about 3,000,000 nucleotides, aligned in a very
specific sequence.Any viable DNA strand
having over 84 nucleotides cannot be the result of random mutations.The probabilities are 1 in 4.80 x 1050
only is natural selection said to have produced everything, but the entire process
was said to be entirely RANDOM!Therefore, it is not “selection,” for nothing was selected!There is no selection process that chooses
only advantageous changes.Both
advantageous and dis-advantageous changes should take place.Many scientists have concluded that natural
selection cannot change one species into another.However, out of that same group are
scientists that now claim that mutations are responsible for changing one
species into another.All evolutionists
agree that it would take either natural selection or mutation.
species there can be many varieties; yet, the species are the same.There are many kinds of dogs, but they are
all dogs; many kinds of cats but they are all cats.There are many different kinds of horses, but
they are still all horses.There are
many colors in pigeons, from white to black, blue, red and so forth, but they
are still all pigeons.Within a species
there can be many variations in the gene pool.Evolutionists claim that once
a species mutates and changes into another species, they cannot return to the
original species.But with all the
variations we have seen above, all remain dogs, cats, horses or pigeons.
a few cases, two very similar species can breed together - for instance, a
donkey and a horse (has to be a male donkey and a female horse to arrive at a
mule), a horse and zebra, a turkey and a chicken.However, the offspring cannot breed with one
another to form a new species.A mule
cannot breed with another mule to produce a mule.
half-horse, half-zebra cannot breed with another half-horse, half-zebra to
produce a half-horse, half-zebra.Neither can a half-turkey, half-chicken breed with another half-turkey,
half-chicken to produce a half-turkey, half-chicken.In rare instances when they do breed, they
invariably produce either a horse or a donkey, horse or zebra and turkey or
chicken.The offspring are crosses and
not cross-overs.They cannot produce a
new breed of animal that can reproduce with others of the same breed.
is no evidence that at any time, in all the history of the world, that even one
new true species has formed from other species.
FOSSILS AND STRATA
did evolutionists determine the age of fossils and different strata?They started off with the theory of evolution
and concluded that the most simplest of creatures must have been the oldest
living things.Therefore, they
categorized the simplest forms of life as being millions of years old.Then, they lined up all forms and the more
modern species were given the shortest existence on earth.The problem is - many modern forms of life
are found in the same strata of earth as the simplest forms, but evolutionists
ignore this fact.
lowest strata of earth that has fossils is called the Cambrian.No fossils appeared before the Cambrian; yet,
while the Cambrian contains a wealth of fossil types and there is no fossil
indicating that one species evolved into another.Each species is different from the
others.There are billions of fossils
from this period and not one shows evolution.All the major animal groups (phylum) are represented and every specie
appears suddenly, both in the Cambrian period and in subsequent periods.There is absolutely no fossil evidence of
gradual evolution of any species.In
other words, each of the hundreds of thousands of species were created exactly
the way they are today (including extinct ones) suddenly!Scientists cannot explain this.
is absolutely no fossil evidence of one species changing into another - not
ever, not now and not in the future.Evolution is an impossible theory to support.
evidence against evolution is over-whelming.We have only touched on the subject.There are many books on the subject.Why then is evolution continuing to be taught in our classrooms to the
exclusion of the Creator theory?It is
mostly because of the deliberate cover-up of any negative evidence against
evolution by the evolutionists themselves.Whenever there is a very minor and isolated discovery that can even
remotely hint that one species could possibly evolve into another (most of the
time, they cannot tell what), it hits the headlines or textbooks.On the other hand, every time there is
evidence against evolution, it never is published by the mass media.For instance, the article in the Discovery
magazine on dinosaur bones containing actual tissue never appeared in any
journals or newspapers.The public is
kept selectively ignorant.
have an agenda: to prove that there is no God!They will go to great lengths to cover up any truth that debunks
evolution and blow up out of proportion, any slight evidence that can be
interpreted as supporting evolution, although there is none.
scientists normally work in very narrow areas of specialty and do not look at
the overall picture.Many obvious
conclusions that debunk evolution are overlooked because most scientists are
not focused on the issue of evolution and do not realize that what they have
discovered debunks evolution.For
instance, scientists that work with DNA are busy researching stem cell growth
and possible applications and do not realize that DNA completely refutes
evolution.They have been led to believe
that evolution is a scientific fact!
evidence is overwhelming that a Creator created the heavens and the earth and
everything in it.His name is Jesus.